After all, how possible that we can lie to ourselves: this life-supporting blue earth itself isn't as we think it's

After all, it's all about having a pithy knowledge of any in a nutshell. Here, it's about getting in the same way Tibet's history as an independent nation state as per both the ancient and modern convention of presenting as a doing, groundbreaking narrative. So it goes on so well with an ontological finding in terms of observer and matter, and that, so unconventionally, of both being there in a dreamy, sensitively wavering state cast forth by the observer's own caprice, delusive way of seeing and rating as otherwise, so reliable, concrete, uncompromising, sort of eternal... Yes, you should be able to put anything in a nutshell to be able to grasp, mind, coax over as you wish. Here, I want to remind you that if you've finished reading Voice for the Voiceless by His Holiness the Dalai Lama and Tibet Brief 20/20 by Michael Van Walt Van Praag, move on to reading Tibet was never Part of China since Antiquity by professor Hon-Shiang Lau. So we can sieve the gist into a nutshell, the mundane side for the world at large. The other side isn't for a commoner but for an eligible receptacle.