བསྟན་འཛིན་བསད་པའི་གྱོད་གཞི། བཙན་བྱོལ་ནང་སྐྱེས་པའི་ན་གཞོན་ཞིག་གིས་བགྱིས་པའི་བརྩམས་སྒྲུང་།

ངས་ངོས་ནས་བལྟས་ན། ན་གཞོན་བསྟན་འཛིན་གྱི་བརྩམས་ཆོས་དེས་བརྡ་ལན་གསལ་པོ་གཉིས་བཏང་སོང་སྙམ་སྟེ། གཅིག་ནི་རྗེས་འབྱོར་བ་ཚོས་བཙན་བྱོལ་ནང་སྐྱེས་པ་ཞིག་ལ་བོད་ཡིག་ཤེས་ཀྱི་མིན་འདུག་ཅེས་འཁང་ར་དང་སྣང་ཆུང་དེར་མི་བདེན་པའི་ར་སྤྲོད་གསལ་པོ་ཞིག་རེད། ཁོ་པ་བཞིན་དགེ་རྒན་ཚད་ལྡན་དུ་མས་བསྐྱངས་ཡོད་ན་སུས་ཀྱང་བོད་ཡིག་ཤེས་ལོས་ཐུབ། སྐབས་རེས་རྗེས་འབྱོར་བ་བོད་ཡིག་ཤེས་རློམ་ཅན་ནམ་མུ་ཅོར་སྒྲོག་མཁན་ཡང་འདི་ལྟའི་བརྩམས་ཆོས་འདོན་རྒྱུ་ཕར་བཞག་ཡིག་ཕྲེང་འགའི་ནང་ཡང་ཡིག་ནོར་གྱིས་ཁེངས་པ་མཐོང་རྒྱུ་འདུག་ག གཉིས་པ་ནི་དཔེ་སྟོན་སློབ་གྲྭར་འཛིན་ཚུལ་ཞན་པ་སྟེ་དབྱིན་ཡིག་ཐོག་རྗེས་ཟིན་ཐུབ་མིན་སྐོར་དོགས་པ་ཡོད་མཁན་ལ་སྟེ། བསྟན་འཛིན་རང་གིས་བརྗོད་པར་ཁོ་པས་སྒྲུང་དེ་དབྱིན་ཡིག་ཐོག་འབྲི་ཐུབ་པའི་གནས་ཚད་ཡོད་པ་ལས་སུན་འབྱིན་དེ་ལྟར་སྣང་ཁོ་ནའོ།།

The twelve stages of interdependent origination: The map of causality in terms of the cycle of life of a sentient being and thereby the vision and idea of its existential entities

Does His Holiness the great 14th Dalai Lama advocate Laicism?

For now, we do seriously need to give a close look at 'why His Holiness the great 14th Dalai Lama of Tibet willingly devolved his centuries old full political authority to a people-elected leader (Kalontripa to  Sikyong) at the outset of 2011, with his half onus of it having already passed on to the same leader of Tibetans diaspora.' He has now and again emphasized on the need of clear demarcation between the religious and political institutions, namely political or worldly deeds for the laity and spiritual deeds for the ordained. From this very act, not just speech and moralizing over, it can be perceived that he advocates laicism at institutional level, namely at functioning level. But at the same time, he has emphasized on the co-existence of, as per the Western term, 'church and state' and that at individual level, namely a politician or a political leader with a strong moral fiber shall prove more domos-oriented or come out as the real utilitarian doer of a public servant. 

Though our democracy in exile is still nascent, thanks for the grandness of HHDL's view and vision and courage, we are proudly sort of one hundred years ahead of those states where a commoner or plebeian can't sound off a phrase of dissatisfaction or being disgruntled against his leader or king or monarch, etc. But we should still work hard to pave the way for that clear demarcation between the two institutions that are sort of more or less jumbled for the time being. 

We Tibetans don't believe in 'Soul': Then what kind of battle

I once read an article by him, LS, rather of one or two paragraphs, maybe on tibet.net, when he was in his first term as Sikyong, that reasonably challenges Red China's interference with the reincarnation of His Holiness the great 14th Dalai Lama. Even the gist of the paragraph or the two was about his having been taken by surprise and thereby demanding what an atheistic group like CCP has such an interest in the same spiritual process of long ethnic history based on Tibetan Buddhism. And now I wonder why he puts himself in the same position, for his being alien to the same process rooted in a unique tradition, and his being so illiterate in Tibetan and Tibetan Buddhist Studies? 

'Soul', as per its direct sense in the Western ethnicity or in the theistic faiths at large, is related with 'Self' or the notion of having such a self or 'I' even after death, such a self or I, rather dogmatic than instinctive that even an animal has, such a self that's in reality out of pure personal fabrication. And, funnily, we Tibetans equate the term with our རྣམ་ཤེས།, the core consciousness of a being, the 'sixth sense', if the term has any deeper implication. But the term 'soul' can't be a phenomenon that is a fundamental consciousness, though there is such a term as 'metempsychosis'. 

By and large, his endeavor of such of any designs, when HHDL himself has made it clear about the same case, if needed, more than twice, is a sort of mimicry of his own way of seeing--Western but not so, Tibetan but not so. Duplicity or a slavish attempt to enlarge his own image even after having failed for ten long years, the time lost in proving himself for being the first young democratically elected personage to whom HHDL devolved his entire political authority with blessings and praises and his own sense of relief by quoting the visionary line from his own work, The Words of Truth. 

In memory of a childhood friend, Tashi Dorjee

Rather than letting myself get shattered by the staggering fact of the lacuna whereupon I can't let myself get stumbled very often (thanks facebook here), it's better to fill the long period of oblivion with something so worth-doing like 'being the change myself' in his memory despite its being latent so far. So read Marcel Proust, if you really want to write that's so laborious and that isn't for 'money'. Thanks Tashi la for coming into my life! 

Monlam AI: སྨོན་ལམ་མི་བཟོའི་རིག་ནུས།

Bravo, Monlam AI, Monalm Artificial Intelligence! What and how I've found one of its main ai instruments works.

 Monlam AI

My own duty as a Tibetan: What I wrote to TPIE as per their recent decree to the people to sound off their notions and concerns

Subject: Mine is a great worry

Respected Chitues and the executive members, 

I, as an ordinary Tibetan, would like to entreat you to make the needy amendments in the charters of our constitution so as to resurrect our Supreme Justice Commission and make it operational. And do also make a way to the appointment of the rest of kalons rather than sticking on to the same old, backward ways of ours, the same narrow sense of siding and finding a protection in it. Once ruined, like the life of a person, the structure of our administration, it will take a long time ahead to be able to make it fully functional once again. In essence, please listen to and respect the people's earnest appeals, for you are our representatives, our servants, not our commanders. Though I don't have my own specified terms or points as per the charters of the constitution to be amended, I do support the people's appeals that you've rejected as 'nameless'. Please don't do so. Please move forward and be eclectic rather than being that hardy among ourselves. Once cast in an alien lot, like abroad, why can't we be that assertive, pugnacious? Please don't do so, please. Please present yourselves as what you're for us, our representatives who decide our future toward the right, timely opportune, direction for our mutual benefits as Tibetans. Please be what you're supposed to be in the parliament and do the jobs in due form. But, if you think you've your own ways of doing things or setting something right that don't get on with the political policy of our administration in exile, you can do them outside of it, on your own terms and by shouldering the full responsibility on yourself. 

Please keep the house in order, with the etiquette well followed and respect between yourselves, as to show us the right examples. Please reset and finetune your way of thinking and looking toward the world at large. Don't let yourselves get stuck to something like an old duel, when the world is moving forward to embrace the notion of humanity, to encounter the challenges that threaten its existence be it made by ourselves or any. 

When we aren't aware of something collective a measure like 'sewage management' and its process, what do we have to brawl and wrangle for, pit for among ourselves that isn't for nation-building but dismantling what we, by the sublime grace and guidance of HHDL, have rigged up so far as the means of our survival in exile, to fight for our rights. 

Please listen to the unbiased voice of the people, not to those sick maniacs who are active online! I do respectfully entreat for your consideration that's wise, wide-viewed. 

With regards and hopes. 

Norsang